Ventures in Pixels Blog - Marketing, Internet and Vietnam

Success!

2009-06-11T08:19:00.003Z

I love this short TED talk from Joachim de Posada, great learnings, leaves lots of open questions and of-course, leaves you wanting more (marshmellows at least). You've got to love that little Columbian girl's reaction!

[Best viewed at full screen here]

LOL: A view of the future from the past

2009-06-01T04:06:00.002Z

Enjoy this film of the future from the people of yester-year, wow!

Bending copyright boundaries: Bing.com and New Google

2009-05-29T04:24:00.002Z

I've just taken a look at the preview video for Bing.com (Microsoft) and Google's new approach to reviews. I can't help wondering where this leaves the rest of the world's internet companies!

Google's stated mission was always to help people find info fast and push them onto to the content owners for relevant info as quickly as possible. The latest iteration of search from the giants is to aggregate customer reviews for hotels, gadgets, computers, restaurants, etc from all the 'trusted' sources and present the info on the search site... hmmm

As far as I can see, most of the 'trusted' sites business models IS the reviews and results, so this new approach to search is breaking that foundation. It's breaking the give-take relationship with search engines and publishers, and it begins to push search vertically up the value-chain, into niche areas. Most of the big media owners have made Google very aware of the boundaries in aggregating news content into Google News. I wonder if the review sites will have the same power.

CNET, Tripadvisor, TopTable and the millions of smaller review sites don't have open API's to these reviews. So, in effect, the search engines are flagrantly breaking copyright - unless, of course, it is for 'non-commercial purposes'.

You could argue that it's good for the consumer, as they get a quicker snapshot of results. The search engines may argue that it is good for the review sites (which would be hard to believe). The negative impact and fallout in the internet industry could be enormous if this approach to search is accepted. For instead of investing in the content and communities in these millions of niche areas, the search engines are creaming the best, for free, for themselves. And that only leads to less revenue for the smaller guy's, less competition and less quality in content.

Search is at a cross-roads. It's not smart-enough. But delving so far into vertical communities, and not just providing results but taking reviews may be a step too far.

There surely has to be a revenue share paid to the content owners, else this is simply copyright theft. If I want to make an action movie, I can't splice the best bits of Terminator 4, Die Hard, Independence Day and release a blockbuster movie worldwide, without some kind of deal with the creators of those films.

WolframAlpha is smart, and it fits well into the eco-system of the internet. Bing and Google are going head-to-head with their own industry :(

I'd love to see what other people make of this.

Game Changers: The Kindle

2009-05-27T06:39:00.004Z

"Kindle accounted for c.10% of N American books sold in Q1 2009; c.4 mil of 38 mil sold - http://bit.ly/dmGhK (RT @stevehall)" (from @bbhlabs twitter)

For those of us outside of the Kindle-fever countries, I'd say this just about sums it up. 10% of all books sold in Q1! Expect the traditional publishing industry to follow the music industry into a decade of arse-covering, future hating legal-suits. The 'free downloaders' are coming! But the industry will be bigger and faster moving than ever before. Book publishers, you better get your game-on because your industry is about to take-off.

The hype and outreach marketing on Kindle is so reminiscent of the iPod, that it's sometimes hard to believe this isn't an Apple product. Massive credit to Amazon for truly launching a game-changing device.

(I would have hoped News Corp to take the lead in this field, given it's portfolio companies and R&D in the e-paper space).

Yahoo Vietnam is quickly losing ground to Vietnam's home-grown services

2009-05-25T09:53:00.005Z

Saturday was Saigon's first Digital Marketing conference and what a room full of beautiful and smart people it was too. I spoke on Digital 101, which was a lot to cover in 1 hour but seemed to be well received. My presentation included children, humour, hot girls and a little violence, so it had the right ingredients for entertainment value.

An interesting take-out from the day was Yahoo confirming that their blogging product 360! is closing...but that actually it is not, it's just a simple upgrade path to 360+. Unfortunately, most of Vietnam believes 360! is dead completely and are already well on their way to moving onto new platforms (Facebook, Twitter, WordPress, Blogger). It was quite a striking example of how in the digital space, information spreads fast, whether it is correct or not. I'm afraid for Yahoo, they've lost their "web" hooks into this market now and will have to rely on IM and Email as their trojan horse to other services.

Mentioned on Saturday was that Yahoo 360! has 1m users. If that is correct, then it is quite significantly smaller than I had imagined. Let's say there are 28m Vietnamese online, Yahoo! 360 has 3.6% of online users. That probably still makes it the leading blogging platform but I suspect not by far, Blogger and My Opera cannot be too far behind.

If you think the 'active' user base may be 30% of 1m, then the platform is already dead. You'll see a much more active base on Vietnamese social networks.

The rapid (albeit small numbers) move of Vietnamese to Facebook, Twitter as well as locally grown social networks like YoBanBe (VinaGame), is a more significant trend than Yahoo and many others are giving credit to. Facebook is a low-effort service which can easily surpass Yahoo 360's user numbers inside 12 months. Guestimates are that 100,000 Vietnamese are now on FB. If each invite 10 friends, FB will already be larger than 360!

Of course, none of this is new news, since the demise of Yahoo 360 as we know has been coming for a long-time. What stands out for me is how Yahoo is looking very Web 1.0 in these times, and that the industry boom in content, media and (hopefully) revenue is all to play for. Yahoo needs a much stronger digital strategy 'for Vietnam' (a locally relevant gameplan) if it wants to fight off the growth of Vietnamese sites like Zing, Kenh14, etc.

With so many plugged into it's IM and email products, it surely has the ingredients to beat anyone. For Yahoo is a market-leader, no doubt. It has the power, the brand and the tools to win. But it doesn't know that it's slowly losing the war. Those research questions from Yahoo need to quickly focus on what the Vietnamese digital influencers are doing, where they are spending their time "now" and what their perceptions are. I think it may give Yahoo a shock.

Video: Inspiring Entrepreneurs to Inspire

2009-05-20T08:23:00.004Z

What's wrong with Murdoch's dream to charge for news online

2009-05-15T04:58:00.002Z

Rupert Murdoch, the part-owner and chairman of News Corp (Star TV, 20th Century Fox, The Times, The Sun, Wall St Journal...) announced that the day's of the free internet are over, and New's will pursue a paid content strategy within 12 months.

Having worked long and hard on both The Times and The Sun's digital products for many years it's a surprising statement and strategy to me. 5 years ago both The Times and The Sun were really not punching their weight, with less than 1m unique users per month each. Over that time investment in content, marketing and technology has brought both titles to around 20m unique users. The point, is that they are each influential in their own right, they reach millions of people each day and the revenues are healthy (albeit a million miles from newspaper takings).

Having built a platform of audience, of influence and of advertisers/commerce, News Corp is in a powerful position to grow new revenues in the digital age. Unfortunately, in these times, we all need the revenue to come along quicker, to grow faster, to replace declines in print. So comes the 'dream' of charging for content, again!

The Wall Street Journal does very nicely from it's subscription revenue. In fact, in studies that I made a few years ago WSJ was earning substantially more than it would have from a free/open advertising business-model. But that's the exception, not the rule. The WSJ is a globally known 'busines' news source, it delivers something of high-value (business thought and news) that many cannot do without. Like The Economist, it's a thought leader and an influencer to which people subscribe.

The quality of journalism in The Times is certainly on par with WSJ but to think that this makes it chargeable is a very 'internal' product-led view of the world. The truth is that the readers 'value' from the content is much less if it is not influencing their daily work or business decisions. The content may well be fantastically written but the prose in "Spur's destruction of Chelsea" (that's my dream!) is not content that a large number of people will pay for...

The reasons:

1) It doesn't add enough value to me (not in the same way a stockmarket recommendation would)

2) I can ALWAYS get that same information for FREE online elsewhere (it may not be so well crafted, but the facts remain the same)

3) The news product is not the "some of it's parts" when it's online. I will only read the bits that I find personally interesting. So you can't charge me $1 a day since one day I might find 1 article interesting, the next day it might be 10 articles.

4) We are still at the beginning of the digital age, many people have still not developed their habits, their brand preferences

5) The internet is GLOBAL. The Times and The Sun are extending their brands from NY and London to Saigon and Siberia. To people in Saigon, The Times is new, not something to charge a premium for.

I expect The Times is the most likely target to trial a new subscription/"pay as you go" service on. I will feel quite sad if that is the case. The pay barrier will hemorrhage readership very quickly, the global reach and influence of the content will diminish overnight and the platform that has been built for the transition of paper to web will be taken away.

Internet business-models are continuing to develop fast, revenues are building proportionately quickly (compared with other media)...just be patient. Please Mr Murdoch, don't hold onto the Candle when the Lightbulb has already been lit.

Asia Geek Events for All

2009-05-11T11:21:00.002Z

A couple of shameless plugs for some Tech events hitting Asia over the coming month:

First up, one that I am speaking at:

"SDM: Vietnam's First Interactive Marketing - Advertising Exhibition & Conference."

In a market where the total media spend online was $8m last year...but where there are 25m people online, there's a huge opportunity for marketeers in Vietnam to 'go digital'. SDM (Saigon Digital Marketing) aims to bring together digital experts with marketeers. It's a day-long event and exhibition on 23.05.09 in Ho Chi Minh City.

I'm covering "Digital Marketing 101: Tips And Tricks From Planning And Strategy To Execution And ROI". It's going to be a one-hour, whirl-wind tour of Digital Marketing, for those marketeers with and without budgets.

Register for the conference and/or exhibition here

Next, The "Geeks on a Plane" Tour.

"Geeks On A Plane is all about leveraging the combined cross border networks of Dave McClure, Founders Fund and Web2Asia to offer attendees an opportunity to accelerate the process of meeting and connecting with key contacts in Tokyo, Beijing and Shanghai's tech and investment sector."

Sounds like a fantastic way for Asian natives to swap knowledge and learn from each other. And 'Asian-impostors' like myself to meet and learn from the best of the big internet players in Asia's biggest digital markets.

It's an invitation only event so register your 'interest' at Geeks On A Plane's website

The fever hits Vietnam... Twitter

2009-05-05T11:17:00.006Z

Sorry, it's been a while, hello blog! A quick update on what we've been up-to, before some more serious posts in the morning...

The fever has definitely made it's way to Vietnam and it could be an epidemic...Twitter that is, not H1N1! Vietnam is starting to get the Twitter bug, buoyed by local and international media hype. The tech media has certainly been crying out for something to talk about other than Facebook or Google's latest lab project.

Like many, I started on Twitter a few years back, and was underwhelmed. What Twitter has pulled-off is launching with a very very very stripped back service and sticking to it. Many, like me, probably dropped off after their first taste. But now twitter has members, active members and lots of them. So the service is alive with inane rumblings from around the world. Like many people, I'm not sure Twitter (or it's members) can survive this level of attention. It's destined to be spam city an even easier place to spam than email. I hope not.

At Buzz.vn we're on the Twitter bandwagon already. We released Vietnam's Twitter page, letting our members watch public tweets coming exclusively from Ho Chi Minh City, Hanoi, Hai Phong and Da Nang. We also added some 'Tags' to let people find the Buzz on Twitter from Vietnam. Filtering for tweets with the word 'hot' or 'love' can throw up some interesting results... but it's always entertaining.

6 months ago there was lots of talk of Twitter clones in Vietnam, but now much of that's subsided. There are some great clones (better than the real thing)...but as most marketers know, it's the first in the mind not the best product which wins.

Like most tech services, the penetration lies in the major cities with HCM and HN generating tens of thousands of tweets a day. But in Vietnam's second/third largest cities there are just 3 members each, Hai Phong and Danang!

So today we launch a campaign "Buzz wants to double the number of Twitter members in Vietnam's second largest cities" ;) (that'll be 6 more people, I think we can do it!)

And, if you speak/read Vietnamese and want to follow some of the cool stuff we save at Buzz, follow us at www.twitter.com/buzzvn

The credit crunch made simple

2009-03-24T10:04:00.002Z

The Crisis of Credit Visualized from Jonathan Jarvis on Vimeo.

Crisis of Credit

Motorcycle Diaries: Police Shades

2009-03-18T07:33:00.003Z

I got stopped by a friendly Saigon 'bobby' (policeman) this week. Entirely my fault, as I passed the red light he pointed his baton at me and waved me over. When I pulled up, and as any self-respecting rider here would, I expected to be greeted with a substantial fine or worse lose my bike to the pound.

Instead, he said, in English, "I like your bike" :)
I babbled at him in London-speak which clearly baffled him.
Then he said, "I like your shirt".
And finally, "Your shades are nice".

At that point, I realised that my fine might not be financial. I didn't fancy walking to my meeting, less still wearing no clothes and no shades. So I quickly wished him a good day, shook his hand and fired up the bike.

Perhaps an omen... my new shades are made by Police.

The future is here. Can you keep up?

2009-03-11T13:23:00.002Z

Paul Graham's two words to describe an Entrepreneur

2009-03-10T08:46:00.003Z

A smart investor here just told me of Paul Graham's blog article where he sum's up the traits of a good entrepreneur in two words:

"If I were running a startup, this would be the phrase I'd tape to the mirror. "Make something people want" is the destination, but "Be relentlessly resourceful" is how you get there."

Getting the essence of a product or business into a few simple words is the goal of so much advertising, investor pitches, hollywood movie pitches. If you can make it simple enough then the idea will probably travel and spread. Which gives you a cheaper way more effective way to market. But it's an incredibly hard thing to do. "If it absolutely has to be there on time", "the low-cost airline", "Honda: The power of dreams".

For Buzz we started with "It's only hot when you make it Buzz", now we're evolving that to "Save the cool web"... as we get closer and clearer to the value proposition and reason for our product.

Paul's business is investing in start-ups, and he's coined this simple phrase, which makes it easy to share his expertise with others. Anyone that works with him will check the next team behind the business plan that lands on their desk against these two words "relentlessly resourceful" - pass / fail.

Unfortunately, as a entrepreneur we can be so "relentless and resourceful" most of the time we can't look at ourselves and see what we need to be. So if you already have those traits, you're probably doing the right things.

WANTED: Digital Advertising Sector. How to fix the digital ad market in Vietnam

2009-03-06T09:51:00.006Z

The digital ad market in Vietnam is in desperate need of fixing.

A growing digital content sector has an abundance of eyeballs everyday. There's good content (and bad), there's web 2.0, there's online gaming, there are communities, there's a little, little e-commerce...

But, I am afraid to say, the ad sector is still broken. And the longer it's broken, the longer everyone must wait for the digital $$s to come.

Here's some ideas on what WE (all of us) need to do to fix it.

1.) Adopt some standards. International IAB digital ad formats would be good. But failing that, Vietnamese own standards for ad sizes, file sizes, technologies. Anything really. Just some standard sizes.

Imagine trying to rescale a Pepsi ad across for 20 sites, each with different sizes, shapes and formats.

2.) Adopt a currency. UUs, PIs, CTRs, CPA, CPC... this may not make sense right now, but it is the currency of the web. So let's not fight it. Adopt it. Because it works, worldwide.

3.) Educate. Clients don't get it. Even the big global brands here really don't understand it. Because it's not their core competence. It's not their game, it's just another media. So WE must help them. Let's teach them its' (our) value. Let's give them some simple standards and a currency to judge us by. Then they'll say "hey, you mean I can reach more people than TV, with 20% of the budget? and do some fun creative stuff with it".

4.) Provide statistics. Who are our users, how many, what do they like. Advertisers cannot make decisions without this. Clients cannot understand your site without this. They simply don't have time to care about it. Make it easy.

5.) Stop fighting. As an industry we really better start working together. Ad networks, marketers, publishers - how can we speed up the education process (clients and agencies). I can't do it on my own. Nor can VCcorp, IDG, Tho Dia, Skydoor or anyone else with a single vested interest. We need a common voice, a common story. Because there are thousands outside of our geekytechnodigital world who really don't understand what we're telling them

6.) Accept. We need to accept that we don't have to reinvent the wheel. The digital ad industry here is truly behind other parts of the world, so lets catch up, and do it fast. I placed more ad dollars last year in the UK market for one client than the entire value of the Vietnam industry. That's not boasting, it's just saying...we need to develop more value out of the +20m people online here!

7.) Be positive. The money isn't there now. But it will be. Where eyeballs go, ad dollars follow, eventually. So let's be positive and drive it forwards. Chris Tran and the guy's at New Media (ad network - now part of AdMax) pushed very hard to make it happen. They did lots of great groundwork. Now it's our turn too.

Thanks for listening. I'd love to hear your views on how to fix this thing. If you feel strongly about it, please feel free to contact me, lets work on this together.

Motorcycle Diaries: Figure of 8

2009-03-03T06:01:00.003Z

Recreating a little of Top Gear Vietnam I successfully passed the Vietnamese driving test a few days ago. Comedy! I had to ride a battered 70cc Super-cub in a figure of 8, then around some traffic cones. I decided to aim for speed to make it a little harder (perhaps my Essex roots showing there). Fortunately I passed, perhaps they were impressed with the Carl Fogarty lean into the bends, which is a relief given my Vespa/Honda collection.

Now to make the test more realistic and the roads safer I have a few suggestions:

- Have some school boys on bicycles riding head on at you
- A taxi reversing across the test centre whilst the drivers' chatting on his mobile
- And a wobbly courier with a fridge-freezer strapped to his Dream just in front of you

On the way back I pulled up at the traffic lights. An old man slowly rolled past me, through the red light, across a busy crossroad, whilst reading a copy of Tuoi Tre (newspaper). He didn't look up once. I bet he could do the test and recite the days headlines at the same time.

2009-03-03T05:55:00.003Z

"The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination"

Albert Einstein

Facebook making $1bn

2009-02-23T06:20:00.002Z

Marc Andreessen talks to Techcrunch about his new fund today and, as a board member of Facebook, say's Facebook is striving to find a new marketing model and platform, rather than take $$'s today through display and ppc. It seems that they are foregoing revenue to force themselves to innovate:

Marc Andreessen:
There’s a lot of confusion out there. Facebook is deliberately not taking a lot of the kind of normal brand advertising that a lot of Web sites will take. So you go to — a company like Yahoo which is another fantastic business and they’ve got these you know banner ads and brand ads all over the place, Facebook has made a strategic decision to not take a lot of that business in favor of building its own sort of more organic business model and it’s still in the process of doing that and if they crack the code on that which I think that we will, then I think it will be very successful and will be very large. The fallback position is to just take normal advertising. And if Facebook just turned on the spigot for normal advertising today, it’d be doing over a billion dollars in revenue. So it’s much more a matter of long term strategy.

Read the full interview and watch the video here.

Marketing: Rules of Digital Engagement

2009-02-20T07:29:00.006Z

As I sit in a slightly air-conditioned office (it's hot today) in Ho Chi Minh City, I'm wondering, am I too British about marketing?

The developed economies have already got a kind of Queensbury Rules for marketing, it makes it a fair fight, that doesn't hurt or offend (most of the time) along the way. The rules of engagment goes a little something like:

- No spamming (email, sms, twitter...)
- No abuse of social networks
- No spyware
- No pop-ups / pop-unders
- No cyber-squatting
- No keyword bidding on each others brands
- No scraping
- No hacking, cracking...

We're preparing lots of fun marketing ideas for Buzz, our recent addition to Vietnam's internet space, and I'm thinking about Vietnam's rules of engagement. For example:

- I get SMS, email spam here regularly from big companies
- Facebook, for me, is personal friend network, but here the first movers are adopting it as a career network (pls see linked-in :-)
- Paid-to-print PR is widely used and accepted (for bloggers too!)
- etc, you get the idea.

I guess we all have developed a digital culture, based on our age, our nationality, how long we've been online and the way we use web-services...
(Facebook tripped all over the very same thing this week with their changes to Privacy Policy).

So we have to change our marketing approach to what is acceptable to the market. That doesn't mean spamming (!) but it does mean being less 'Queensbury' about it, a little more street-fighting may be necessary.

Are the rules of digital engagement different in your country?

We're all criminals..or Pirates

2009-02-20T06:42:00.002Z

Do you know what a 'torrent' is? How about if I say 'Vuze' or 'Azureus' or Limewire?

We'll then you're probably also a criminal, so add your mugshot to http://filesharer.org/.

The big news of the week was The Pirate Bay founders, the last bastion of downloading, going to trial. Filesharer.org wants to create a site with all the self-confessed downloaders in the world, in support of PB.... but judging by the take-up rate, I think most criminals are too scared to confess. lol.

Time to be "Economic"

2009-02-08T11:22:00.004Z

This quote is borrowed 'third-hand' via the excellent maoxian.com blog:

Given where we are today, there are only three ways to restore a balance between current private debt levels and our reduced, but much more realistic, asset values: we can bite the bullet and drastically write down debt; we can let the very long passage of time wear down debt levels as we save more and restore our consumer balance sheets; or we can inflate the heck out of our debt and reduce its real value.

So what's it going to be?

The economic impact of the end of credit is currently ripping through USA, UK and Europe. Asia, and Vietnam, is just beginning to feel this tidal wave. What can we expect; FDI dries up, exports plummet, currencies devalue and asset values either tumble further or gather dust un-traded.

In the internet space, VC's and funds like IDG and VinaCap JFJ are going to see the underlying value of their investments tumble too and, surely, will expect their intrapreneurs to make the already invested money last longer, rather than go for 2nd/3rd round funding. Fortunately, online revenue models are not yet established in this market, so not many businesses are going to be relying on income to stay afloat. Interesting times ahead.

Marketing: The Rise and Rise of ROI

2009-02-02T07:46:00.004Z

Martin Sorrell is quietly taking out strategic 'digital' investments like a sniper in a tower. The latest for WPP group is an investment in Omniture, the web analytics firm whose tools are relied on by many of the largest media and brand websites in the world.

Having worked at both WPP (Mindshare London) and News Corp (Times/Sun) these investments, although small, look crystal clear in delivering greater power, influence and effectiveness for the WPP marketing stable. For many of the very media companies WPP is buying from use these analytics tools for their sprawling online empires. And many of WPP's clients or pitch-list (wishlist) also rely on Omniture for their in-house analysis and insight.

In lean times like these, advertisers will want more than "half the money they spend on advertising" to be effective (; John Wannamaker). Now more than ever every marketing $1 has to be accounted for, so it has to count. WPP can look to drive 'display' advertising yields lower by focusing clients on ROI, and drive it's own performance based commission's higher by improving ROI.

WPP strategy is doing a Marketing agency version of Google (information storage and retrieval), or News Corp (media delivery)...rather than just marketing, it's getting into owning the delivery platforms for "insight", "advertising" and "revenue". This cements it's place with media owners and clients. Smart.

But, the ROI space of digital marketing services is high-effort, high attention, high manpower, low-margin, so old media better still pay for the fancy offices for a few more years to come.

Obama: "more productive than any on Earth"

2009-01-23T02:25:00.003Z

Obama is, quite simply, an amazing man. Whatever happens from now may change that opinion but at this time you couldn't hope for a smarter, stronger more truthful leader.

We can restore opportunity and prosperity. We should never forget that our workers are still more productive than any on Earth. Our universities are still the envy of the world. We are still home to the most brilliant minds, the most creative entrepreneurs, and the most advanced technology and innovation that history has ever known.

There's not a single claim in this inauguration quote that isn't true (and I'm not from the U.S).

America's own inventiveness and productivity creates new prosperity. Sitting here in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam has the same drive and desires. But right now the productivity of people (as a whole) is not anywhere close to the West.

There are many very smart, motivated and highly productive people in Vietnam but the pool of this talent is still much too small. So the country must still rely too heavily on it's low-cost wage to compensate for lower-productivity.

Within the borders of Vietnam, especially for international companies here, the bidding war to grab that highly skilled worker doesn't matter too much. (If you need a great manager to run your operation you have to pay). That's fine when your selling to the local market but not when you're exporting or outsourcing. Then, the productivity and wage balance must be in tune with competition from China, India, Europe, USA, Russia, S.Africa. So it's important that wages in Vietnam don't get too far ahead of productivity and skills.

Global commerce today is ruthless at finding this productive 'balance' and in allocating business and trade to the best. Vietnam has it's place at the table in textiles, shoes and commodities. China has consumer manufacturing. America continues to have it's place in Finance, Internet, Telecoms... because it's productivity more than compensates for it's higher wages.

Comment: Is there life in Newspapers?

2009-01-18T12:09:00.003Z

Seth Godin's, the digital marketing guru, has an interesting post on what will we miss when the Newspaper is gone. As a former 'digital' exec at News Corp's The Times and The Sun, I've had a good close look at this.

Back in 2005 I used to think the newspaper would quickly be superceded by the web, blogs, online newspapers, citizen journalism. Actually, it's pure economics that will bring their downfall, eventually. But unlike Seth, I think there is and will continue to be a demand for the newspaper experience. The problem is how to replicate it without paper?

Unlike the web, newspapers bring it all to you, in one convenient, well organised package. Rather than using a website where we headline scan or just delve into the categories we love (Footie, Business) to get our fix, a newspaper has an ability to 'interrupt', to get us to read something we may not have looked for. I personally never look at the celeb gossip on the web, but in a newspaper, I'll read those stories and quite like it.

The Sun, for example, offers a strong point of view, it champions charitable causes, it play's with celebrities lives, hits you with football gossip. The experience is light but this is a well crafted product. It can be 30 minutes of entertainment to fuel a 'pub conversation'. It's a marmite product for most (either love it or hate it) but either way, it offers a wrapped up read. Plenty of websites do the same but I would never consumer as much of the content across as many subjects on a screen.

The Times is an entirely different beast. Founded in intelligently crafted articles and analysis, it has gravitas and authority. Individually bloggers, such as Seth, can give us this same quality but they are each covering one topic or category, and we have to discover each one of them to get the total picture. The web is great for 'otaku' not so good for the wider picture.

It is easy to pull the pieces of a newspaper apart and replace each one with a fantastic website, blog, forum. But it is the physical 'paper' that makes the daily or weekly a uniquely captive experience, for readers and for advertisers.

Seth is absolutely right about the things going against the newspapers future. Printing oodles of paper, trucking it around the country, doesn't make a lot of sense in today's world. Surely either the environment or just the distribution costs alone will catch-up and surpass the revenues. But I think that day is still some years away.

In Asia and developing countries many big newspapers are in the growth phase. In Vietnam, as incomes are rising, and despite 100% free wi-fi in the cities, circulations are steadily increasing year on year. Distribution and production costs are lower in these countries too. So we may see the newspaper living on in developing nations, long after it is no longer viable in the West.

If the world's media houses can find a way to give me that 'newspaper experience' without the paper, I'll continue to buy. But it certainly wont be through a website. And I wont fly to Asia to get it!

Green: A cup of tea or 2 Google searches

2009-01-12T04:10:00.004Z

I always held this idea that us internetters are working in a cleaner, greener industry than our offline counterparts. We'll as I kind of suspected, I was kidding myself. Time to clean up our act!

The Telegraph today reports on research showing just 2 searches in Google generates as much C02 as boiling a kettle (14g). That's a lot!

Now if Google handles 2m searches a minute (conservative guess), that's 14,000kg's of C02 produced.

The average car produces 166g per kilometre. So in one minute Google users have produced enough to travel 84,337 kilometres (2 times around the world).

Of course, you'd need a pretty big car to fit everyone in!

------------------------------------------

Update from Google 13/01/09
Google are clearly sensitive about this, and good on them, so they've tried to set the record straight with their own explanation.

Following their numbers, you could drive that car 2,410 kilometres a minute for all google searches happening. No trips around the world then! But still 'enough' and a reminder of the impact internet has on the environment.

Powering a Google search
1/11/2009 10:48:00 PM
Not long ago, answering a query meant traveling to the reference desk of your local library. Today, search engines enable us to access immense quantities of useful information in an instant, without leaving home. Tools like email, online books and photos, and video chat all increase productivity while decreasing our reliance on car trips, pulp and paper.

But as computers become a bigger part of more people's lives, information technology consumes an increasing amount of energy, and Google takes this impact seriously. That's why we have designed and built the most energy efficient data centers in the world, which means the energy used per Google search is minimal. In fact, in the time it takes to do a Google search, your own personal computer will use more energy than Google uses to answer your query.

Recently, though, others have used much higher estimates, claiming that a typical search uses "half the energy as boiling a kettle of water" and produces 7 grams of CO2. We thought it would be helpful to explain why this number is *many* times too high. Google is fast — a typical search returns results in less than 0.2 seconds. Queries vary in degree of difficulty, but for the average query, the servers it touches each work on it for just a few thousandths of a second. Together with other work performed before your search even starts (such as building the search index) this amounts to 0.0003 kWh of energy per search, or 1 kJ. For comparison, the average adult needs about 8000 kJ a day of energy from food, so a Google search uses just about the same amount of energy that your body burns in ten seconds.

In terms of greenhouse gases, one Google search is equivalent to about 0.2 grams of CO2. The current EU standard for tailpipe emissions calls for 140 grams of CO2 per kilometer driven, but most cars don't reach that level yet. Thus, the average car driven for one kilometer (0.6 miles for those in the U.S.) produces as many greenhouse gases as a thousand Google searches.

We've made great strides to reduce the energy used by our data centers, but we still want clean and affordable sources of electricity for the power that we do use. In 2008 our philanthropic arm, Google.org, invested $45 million in breakthrough clean energy technologies. And last summer, as part of our Renewable Energy Cheaper than Coal initiative, we created an internal engineering group dedicated to exploring clean energy.

We're also working with other members of the IT community to improve efficiency on a broader scale. In 2007 we co-founded the Climate Savers Computing Initiative, a group which champions more efficient computing. This non-profit consortium is committed to cutting the energy consumed by computers in half by 2010 — reducing global CO2 emissions by 54 million tons per year. That's a lot of kettles of tea.

Update on 1/12 @ 4 PM: Harvard professor Alex Wissner-Gross provided new details on his energy research, in a TechNewsWorld article.

Posted by Urs Hölzle, Senior Vice President, Operations

Google Kettle Response

Internet Radio/Music: an industry stuggling to find it's audience

2008-12-20T02:24:00.006Z

So Pandora the music-recommendation engine just hit 20m registered users, with around 5m active uniques per month. This was press-released (via twitter). I am little disappointed with these numbers along with those of other favourites, last.fm and imeem.com. (I love last.fm by the way)

I was a big UK Pandora fan until the RIAA (or whatever they are called) stopped us listening :(

Anything on the internet has to be much bigger or much more targeted than it's offline equivalent to be commercially viable. It's a shame, I'd like to see recommendation-internet radio hit the mainstream and become a whole new industry. Until these guy's get scale, they're just not going to have the power to negotiate decent deals with the copyright holders.

MySpace Music (user playlist recommendation), according to the techcrunch article, are posting 17.8m users) so they seem to have the space for 'broadcast' radio advertisers already. But that's still small beer when one station on old Radio get's >10m concurrent listeners.

This intelligent 'music recommendation' space now seems to be getting superceded by 'user recommendations', like MySpace, in the form of playlists. The playlist is a natural evolution following the ipod craze that's swept the world. So is it too late for the clever guy's and their auto recommendations?

Short of the killer facebook/MySpace app that everyone must have, or getting embedded in Windows Media Player/iTunes, it looks like the "bigger audience" route is not going to happen for a while for auto music-recommendation. Perhaps a strategic partnership with Facebook might do the trick. Without this scale the revenue model for these guy's may be a little strained.

I am sure that Last.fm (etc) have vast amounts of highly detailed info on what our individual music tastes are. They're the perfect 'seeding' network, the perfect place to create a word-of-mouth buzz around a new artist, new celebrity, new music videos, new concerts, events. For a marketeer of any of these things, to be able to place your relevant new artist, gig, etc in-front of 3,000 people who are a perfect match is like gold dust. It is cheaper than finding them offline, cheaper than magazine ads, flyposting... But is it enough to fund the business?

Music-recommendation engine streams needs to be a default tab in music players (WMP, iTunes...) fully integrated, catalogued, peer-rated music... so you just choose and hit 'play'. And, better still, make it a default addition to your social network profile, your iGoogle, netvibes. When it's just like the old-fashioned radio, turn it on and listen, then the numbers will could reach tens of millions.

For me, the web-players need to change the game and start competing with offline Radio rather than each other. The potential audience numbers can be much bigger online, the technologies are there, and users have an added dimension of being able to fine-tune the show to their tastes. Right now we are at the beginning. This can and will be a huge advertising supported industry. This space has room to grow!